Authors: Fang Li, Rahul V Rane, Victor Luria, Zijun Xiong, Jiawei Chen, Zimai Li, Renee A Catullo, Philippa C Griffin, Michele Schiffer, Stephen Pearce, Siu Fai Lee, Kerensa McElroy, Ann Stocker, Jennifer Shirriffs, Fiona Cockerell, Chris Coppin, Carla M Sgrò, Amir Karger, John W Cain, Jessica A Weber, Gabriel Santpere, Marc W Kirschner, Ary A Hoffmann, John G Oakeshott, and Guojie Zhang
Published in: Molecular Ecology Resources
Many Drosophila species differ widely in their distributions and climate niches, making them excellent subjects for evolutionary genomic studies.
Here, we have developed a database of high-quality assemblies for 46 Drosophila species and one closely related Zaprionus. Fifteen of the genomes were newly sequenced, and 20 were improved with additional sequencing. New or improved annotations were generated for all 47 species, assisted by new transcriptomes for 19.
Phylogenomic analyses of these data resolved several previously ambiguous relationships, especially in the melanogaster species group. However, it also revealed significant phylogenetic incongruence among genes, mainly in the form of incomplete lineage sorting in the subgenus Sophophora but also including asymmetric introgression in the subgenus Drosophila.
Using the phylogeny as a framework and taking into account these incongruences, we then screened the data for genome-wide signals of adaptation to different climatic niches.
First, phylostratigraphy revealed relatively high rates of recent novel gene gain in three temperate pseudoobscura and five desert-adapted cactophilic mulleri subgroup species.
Second, we found differing ratios of nonsynonymous to synonymous substitutions in several hundred orthologues between climate generalists and specialists, with trends for significantly higher ratios for those in tropical and lower ratios for those in temperate-continental specialists respectively than those in the climate generalists.
Finally, resequencing natural populations of 13 species revealed tropics-restricted species generally had smaller population sizes, lower genome diversity and more deleterious mutations than the more widespread species.
We conclude that adaptation to different climates in the genus Drosophila has been associated with large-scale and multifaceted genomic changes.
Phylogeny and climate niches of the 47 species. Species with names in bold are newly sequenced, those in black are improved by additional sequences generated in this study and those in grey are as previously published. Stars (★)indicate the species for which we added transcriptome data, diamonds (◆) indicates those for which we resequenced multiple individuals. Pie chart areas for each node show the proportions of the three possible topologies for the corresponding branch, with blue denoting the most common topology (i.e., the species tree, as shown) and red and orange the two alternatives (i.e., with each of the two daughter lineages in the species tree as the outgroup instead). The three nodes indicated with red dots are those for which dates had been estimated by Tamura et al. (2004). Climate zones occupied by each species according to the Köppen classification are presented on the right, with the shaded portions denoting presence in that environment.
Li F, Rane RV, Luria V, Xiong Z, Chen J, Li Z, Catullo RA, Griffin PC, Schiffer M, Pearce S, Lee SF, McElroy K, Stocker A, Shirriffs J, Cockerell F, Coppin C, Sgrò CM, Karger A, Cain JW, Weber JA, Santpere G, Kirschner MW, Hoffmann AA, Oakeshott JG, Zhang G (2022) Phylogenomic analyses of the genus Drosophila reveals genomic signals of climate adaptation. Molecular Ecology Resources PDF DOI